Search
 
 
 Download Area
  Categories
Personal Improvement
Personality Development
Professional Development
Cool Zone-Fun & Cool
Change Management
Inspiration & Motivation
 

  Share

First time in kamyabology now you can downlaod the best ppts.

click here DOWNLOAD PPTS

 

Gandhari- The Enigmatic Queen in Mahabharata

Dr. Mala Sinha

Gandhari was the daughter of Subala , the king of Gandhara- the land from river Sindhu to Kabul. She was a devotee of Lord Shiva , and from him had got the boon for a hundred sons. Having heard of her pious nature and the boon, Bhishma – the karta of the Kuru dynasty sent a marriage proposal for her with Prince Dhritarashtra of Hastinapur who was blind.

King Subala knew about the handicap of the prince , but was honored by the proposal from the illustrious Kurus and agreed to the alliance. He sent Gandhari along with her brother Shakuni ; with appropriate dowry and servants to Hastinapur to solemnize the marriage. That Dhritarashtra was blind was something that Gandhari got to know only when she reached Hastinapur.

What she must have gone through as a young girl about to be married to a blind prince is less known in the Mahabharata. What is well known is that when the marriage was to be solemnized, Gandhari decided that she should in no way be superior to her husband , and bound her eyes with a silk scarf.

She had decided that if her husband could not see, she too would not see. She was hailed as a sati for her sacrifice and very little is known about Dhritrashtra’s deeper feelings regarding his wife’s decision .Only in their last journey when Dhritrashtra and Gandhari were living in Sanyasa in the forest along with Kunti and Vidura did he bare his heart on this matter.

Gandhari was a pious queen, but do her actions in Mahabharata reflect this fact . When Kunti - wife of Pandu, the reigning King of Hastinapur, gave birth to Yudhhister -the first grandchild of the Kurus ,Gandhari was also already pregnant for two years at that time . Impatient that Kunti already had a son she forced her delivery and gave birth to a mass of flesh, which, with the help of Rishi Vyasa became her hundred sons and one daughter. Duryodhana was the born first from this mass. As early as this, Gandhari was competing with her sister in law Kunti , and it is not surprising that later her sons always competed with Kunti’s sons – The Pandavas.

The Kauravas, as the sons of Dhritrashtra and Gandhari were called were all the time scheming to kill their cousins – the five Pandavas ,who were sons of Kunti and Madri ( second wife of King Pandu). Both Gandhari and Dhritarastra knew about this. When Duryodhana and Shakuni hatched the plot to kill the Pandavas by burning them in the lac palace which was specially constructed for them in Varnavata ; it was Dhritarashra who ordered his young nephews to go and live there. Gandhari could have prevailed on her husband to stop this but did not. She also never asked her brother Shakuni- mentor to Duryodhana to leave Hastinapur and go back to Gandhara.

By the time the battle of Kurukhshetra ( which had lasted for eighteen days) ended, Gandhari had lost all her sons . Her hatred towards the Pandava was far greater than her grief for loss of her sons. After the war, when the five Pandava brothers came to grieve and take her blessings she wanted to curse Yuddhister , but Rishi Vyasa’s exhortation to her on the meaning of dharma made her control her anger. Yet when Yuddhsiter prostrated before her , she saw his nails from beneath the veil and the look made his nails turn blue. They remained blue thereafter always.

But Gandhari did curse Krishna ,for she held him responsible for the war which killed so many. According to her, since Krishna was divine he could have stopped the war, had he wanted to do so. She cursed Krishna that 36 years later his own Vrishni clan would all be annihilated because they would all kill each other. Krishna told Gandhari that he had tried his best to stop the war and he could not .

He explained that though he was morally on the side of Pandavas because of their righteousness; he had blessed Duryodhana also ( which was one of the reasons he had gone to heaven despite his wickedness). He reminded Gandhari that her own indifference to dharma was far greater than that of her blind husband , specially because she being pious lady was well versed in the matters of right and wrong .

From the narrative of Mahabharata it appears that when Gandhari bound her eyes to the outside world she also had have put a veil on her inner eyes. Despite her piety , she never took strong steps against acts of injustice committed by her sons. On the other hand Dhritrashtra had many complexes. Because of his blindness, despite being the elder son, he was not made the King of Hastinapur and Pandu his younger brother became the king .However Pandu never really ruled and died an early death and so Dhritrashtra was the de facto King in Hastinapur. But the denial of kingship always gnawed his heart and he believed that Duryodhana his son , more than Yudhhister his nephew , was the rightful heir of Hastinapur. In this context it is easier to understand Dhritrashtra’s cunning and connivance in the schemes against the Pandavas.

There is no doubt that Gandhari did an extremely difficult thing, an ordinary person could never have done ,by choosing to not see the world when she could have. Dhristrastra was born blind and by adulthood his body and senses would have been accustomed to not seeing. Rather his other senses would have become sharper to compensate for the visual handicap, as it usually happens with such people. But this was not the case with Gandhari – she must gone through unimaginable difficulties when she went about blindfolded. In the entire story Gandhari could “ see” but chose “not to see” both literally and figuratively.

Question:

What kind of role do you think Gandhari would have played in Mahabharata if she had not bound her eyes? Would the fate of Hastinapur have been any different if she could “see “ ?

Is there a noble lesson we can draw from the self imposed blindness of Gandhari?Leave your views along with your email id below.

The best comment/view wil get a 2 gb pen drive

 

 

Try Quiz -3 just Log in and start Ten questions -5 min

win the best seller books The White Tiger-Aravind Adiga

Very Convenient
Use the button below to refer and insert the ids from your address book
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Please Rate this PPT and Leave your comments
Your Rating
Your Comment
Comments

RatingComment
5 Starkaurava the sons lacked proper upbringing because of both the parents being visually impaired that might be one of the cause for them being having wrong values
5 Starexcellent learnings she surelywas the influencer
5 Starwas binding her eyes an act of traditional values of not being superior to her husband in any way? OR By blinding her self she could truly empathise with her husband's handicap and thus become a closer partner. OR Was it an act of martyrdom or escapism . I truly foxed by this action . It definately requires great forbearance, some thing an ordinary person could not have done. Personally I feel she denied God when she blinded her self- To be able to see is a gift of God.She also in all liklihood burdened her husband with guilt for becuse of him she had deprived herself. She too playeda role in adding to Dhritarashtra's complexes. I am sure Mahabharata wopuld havea different end if she could see.
5 Starpls leave your email id so that we can get in touch with you for the gift
4 StarNice one..
5 StarTo me, Gandhari's life says one morality. It's up to one to look at the mirror and appreciate oneself or view through the window and curse everything outside. It's ok to be blindfolded unless you could view through your Heart. Though she made sacrifices she isn't viewed high because of immorality. Had she not been blindfolded even then not much of difference would have been there because even then she would have cursed Krishna which no noble person could do. Email : karthik187@gmail.com
5 StarThe story of Mahabharata is so interesting.. Yes, if Gandhari had not blinded her eyes, the following would have happened:- 1 She would have been able to see and take action against treacherous shakuni 2 Being a woman, she would not have never tolerated draupadi vastraharan.. 3 Son's upbringing would definately have been different 4 when she called duryodhan to see him through her eyes and provide him invincible power, the same would not had happen.. Learnings:- At that moment of time, when she was getting married, her descision of self-blind comes across as an act of tremendous forbearance..however the repurcussions of their own actions would lead to such heavy toll, no one would have predicted.. Same is the case with Bheesm, karna and other great warriors.. - Hemant kumar hellohemant@gmail.com
2 StarBasically her insights were much sharper and she knew what she was going to see in future . When her sight could make nails blue , what would happen if she saw with eyes open full? This is the reason she chose to be blindfolded. The conclusion should conform with the introduction for making the article excellent.
3 StarGod creates human beings based upon thier prarabdha pala so if you choose to go against the will of god gandhari is the example for the fall of the family and loosing all her sons ,she is an ex for us not go against the natures law and to use all our senses to be good and teach good to the generations
5 StarI dont think today's modern people will take any noble lesson from Gandhari. Also, by NOT doing anything to stop Duryodhana she herself is also to be blamed. Had her eyes been open literally speaking would that have made any difference ? I dont think so. On the other hand, the fact that her other senses were not highly developed as compared to Dhrishtrastra THAT might have added to her 'passive' behavious. Maybe, just maybe if she could SEE the wrong-doings of Duryodhana and Shakuni, she could have atleast raised her voice against it. Although, i am not sure how much difference that would have made to Mahabharatha since Duryodhana would have ignored those words too. HemantkumarJain@gmail.com https://shoOOonya.blogspot.com
4 Starif she would have controled her brother shakuni, then the kurukshetra war averted, because as per my knowledge,. shakuni has instigated Duryodhan for a conflict
4 StarThe symbolism used by the author can not be missed here. Probably Gandhari symbolizes the 'self deceit' we all have. Despite being well versed in 'dharma' she chose to turn a 'blind eye'. She always had the option of keeping her eyes open and also guiding her husband in the right direction. She could have made him see what he was not able to. While her sacrifice is commemndable, was it really of any use? Do we see a tinge of 'ego' there?. Where was this 'goodness' of her's when it came to birth of pandavas or subsequent harassment by their cousins. Or was it too much of 'moha'attachment? Undoubtedly this character of Gandhari reflects the internal conflict in us and also the way we choose to 'nazar andaaz' them. comments by: ssnayak@gmail.com
4 StarI believe most mythological stories, including the epic of Mahabharata are allegorical in nature. Gandhari's self imposed blindness is an extended metaphor that represents a choice to block objectivity and to refuse to see the reality. Perhaps, Gandhari chose this experience to further her spiritual growth by blocking sight physical and replacing it with vision metaphysical. However, the epic suggests that she could not control her prejudices and thus ended up not optimally using the opportunity that she had created for herself - a classic case of human limitations having an adverse effect on a choice made at a level of higher consciousness. There is definitely a noble lesson in that she had the courage to choose vision instead of mere sight. The fate of Hastinapur could have been different had she truly and optimally exercised her vision. She would have then created a model of righteousness and epitomised the human ideal. - Rukmini Iyer rukmini28@yahoo.co.in
5 Starif gandhari had chosn the path of truth and merit mahaabharat would not have happened. she became enamoured by the thought of duryodhan becoming a king, thus got caught in wordly vortex
5 StarGandhari - a reluctant mother, a role model as housewife, an idol of sacrifice.
5 StarSelf imposed blindness of Gandhari is an act of escapism and avoidance. In fact it is a cowardly act responsible for the magnitude of destruction. Had she to instead step in and remain with her eyes open she could have been instrumental in providing guidance and support to the Kauravas thereby guiding them on the right path.
4 StarAs it’s well mentioned in the article – “when Gandhari bound her eyes to the outside world she also had have put a veil on her inner eyes” and I personally support that as I believe it was gandhari's personal choice to refuse to accept the reality, truth, wisdom & justice. All through out her life she was competing against her sister-in-law & her sons without realizing the reason behind it. Had she been more compassionate about the people of Hastinapur she should have supported the Pandavas for the betterment of everyone. Not only that she could have instilled right values in her sons rather that feeding them with venom. Had she kept her eyes open she could have prevented the war of Mahabharta & thousands of lives including her sons could have been saved. The lesson one can learn through her self-imposed blindness was self control & loyalty to her husband as it was no mean task to take the decision.
4 StarAs it’s well mentioned in the article – “when Gandhari bound her eyes to the outside world she also had have put a veil on her inner eyes” and I personally support that as I believe it was gandhari's personal choice to refuse to accept the reality, truth, wisdom & justice. All through out her life she was competing against her sister-in-law & her sons without realizing the reason behind it. Had she been more compassionate about the people of Hastinapur she should have supported the Pandavas for the betterment of everyone. Not only that she could have instilled right values in her sons rather that feeding them with venom. Had she kept her eyes open she could have prevented the war of Mahabharta & thousands of lives including her sons could have been saved. The lesson one can learn through her self-imposed blindness was self control & loyalty to her husband as it was no mean task to take the decision.
5 StarGandhari chose not to see practicaly but she actully became blind both phycisaly and also by not seeing the rithtousness. had she corrected their sons mahabharat may have not taken place. but she just followed her husband , supporting their sons in wrong doings
5 StarGandhari chose not to see practicaly but she actully became blind both phycisaly and also by not seeing the rithtousness. had she corrected their sons mahabharat may have not taken place. but she just followed her husband , supporting their sons in wrong doings
4 StarAs it’s well mentioned in the article – “when Gandhari bound her eyes to the outside world she also had have put a veil on her inner eyes” and I personally support that as I believe it was gandhari's personal choice to refuse to accept the reality, truth, wisdom & justice. All through out her life she was competing against her sister-in-law & her sons without realizing the reason behind it. Had she been more compassionate about the people of Hastinapur she should have supported the Pandavas for the betterment of everyone. Not only that she could have instilled right values in her sons rather that feeding them with venom. Had she kept her eyes open she could have prevented the war of Mahabharta & thousands of lives including her sons could have been saved. The lesson one can learn through her self-imposed blindness was self control & loyalty to her husband as it was no mean task to take the decision.
4 StarIt was proved that she was not really blind
5 StarIf we look at it from a different angle in conjunction with modern era, I couldnt understand why gandhari got artificially blind. in my opinion she could have help her husband to rule better and can feel him seeing with her eyes.
5 StarIf we look at it from a different angle in conjunction with modern era, I couldnt understand why gandhari got artificially blind. in my opinion she could have help her husband to rule better and can feel him seeing with her eyes.